Scruples are a disease, physical and moral, which produces a sort of derangement of conscience, and causes one to harbor vain fears, of having offended God.This disease is not restricted , to beginners; still, it is found in
them as well as in the more advanced souls. Hence, we must say a word about them and explain:
1.the nature,
2. the object,
3. the disadvantages and advantages of scruples,
and
4. the remedies against them.
1. Nature of Scruples
The term scruple (from the Latin scrupulus, pebble)
was employed for ages past to designate a small weight under
which only the most sensitive scales would tilt. In the
moral sense, it stands for some trifle which only the most
delicate conscience would notice. Hence, this word has
come to be commonly used to designate the anxiety about
having offended God which certain souls feel for little or no'
reason. The better to know the nature of scruples we shall
explain their origin, and degrees, as well as the distinction
between a scrupulous and a delicate conscience.
Origin.
Scruples arise sometimes from purely
natural causes and sometimes they are due to supernatural intervention.
a) From a natural point of view, scruples are often
a physical and moral disease.
1 ) The physical ailment which
brings about this disorder is a sort of nervous depression,
which hinders a well-balanced decision on moral questions
and tends to produce without solid reasons the obsessing
idea that one has sinned.
2) There are also moral causes
which produce the same effect, such as a meticulous mind,
a mind that loses itself amid the most trifling details, that
wants to reach absolute certitude in all things; a beclouded
mind, that represents God not as a just judge, but as
a merciless one ; a mind that confuses feeling with consent
in human acts, and imagines, that because the imagination
has been for long alive to vivid impressions, sin has been
committed ; an obstinate mind, that prefers its own judgment
to that of the confessor for the very reason that it lets itself
be led by impressions rather than by reason.
When these two causes, physical and moral, are present,
the evil is more deeply rooted and the cure is more difficult.
b) Scruples can also arise from a preternatural
intervention on the part of God or of the devil.
1) God allows us to be thus obsessed either as a punish-
ment, chiefly of our pride, of pur inclinations to vain
complacency, or as a trial, to make. ..us expiate our past
faults, to detach us from spiritual consolations, and bring
us to a higher degree of sanctity. This is the case espe-
cially with the souls whom He wants to fit for contem-
plation, as - we shall explain when treating of the uni-
tive way.
2) The devil also at times injects his activity into the
morbid predisposition of our nervous system in order to
create a turmoil in our souls. He persuades us that we are
in the state of mortal sin in order to hinder us from receiv-
ing Holy Communion, or to hamper us in the discharge of
our duties of state; above all, he strives to deceive us as to
the gravity of some act or other in order to make us sin,
because of a false conscience, even when there is no matter
for sin and much less for grievous sin.
Degrees.
Evidently there are many degrees
in scruples:
a) At the outset it is simply question of a me-
ticulous conscience, extremely fearful, which sees sin where
sin does not exist;
b) then it is a matter of transient
scruples which one submits to the judgment of one's spiri-
tual director, accepting forthwith his decision;
c) lastly, it
is a case of scruples properly so called, tenacious and
obstinate.
Distinction between a Scrupulous and a Delicate Conscience.
a) Their genesis or starting-point is not the same.. The
delicate conscience loves God ardently and, in order to
please Him, wants to avoid the least fault, the slightest
wilful imperfection. The scrupulous" conscience is led, on
by a certain egotism which causes an inordinate eagerness
for absolute certainty of one's state of grace.
b) The delicate conscience, possessed of a horror of sin and
knowing its own feebleness, has a rational, yet quiet fear of
displeasing God; the scrupulous conscience harbors vain
fears of sinning in every circumstance.
c) The tender conscience knows how to discriminate
between mortal and venial sin, and, in case of doubt, abides
by- the judgment of the spiritual director; the scrupulous
conscience peevishly questions the decisions of the spiritual
director and submits to them only with difficulty.
Whilst scruples are a real evil to be carefully avoided,
there is nothing more precious than a delicate conscience.
Sometimes scruples are universal, bearing on
all subjects. Before an action, they magnify beyond all
proportion the dangers that may be encountered in this or
that circumstance; after an action, they fill the soul with
groundless anxieties and easily convince it of having sinned
gravely.
More often scruples bear upon a number of
particular subjects .
a) Past confessions: even after having made several general confes-
sions, one is not satisfied, one fears lest all has not been accused, or
lest sorrow has been defective, and one wants always to begin all 'over
again
b) Evil thoughts: the imagination is filled with dangerous or
obscene thoughts, and since these make a certain impression, one fears
one has given consent, nay one is sure of having consented, although
one was quite displeased at them
c) Blasphemous thoughts : because
such ideas cross the mind, one is persuaded of having acquiesced
in spite of the horror one experiences,
d) The virtue of charity:
one has for instance, listened to conversations against the neighbor
without protesting; one has, through human respect, neglected the
duty of fraternal correctiqn, one has scandalized the neighbor by
indiscreet talk, or, one has failed, upon witnessing a crowd congregate,
to ascertain whether an accident had occurred where the ministrations
of a priest might have been needed to give absolution 1 to the dying; in
all this, grievous sins are seen, e) The correct pronunciation and
enunciation of the words of Consecration, the integral recitation of the
Divine Office, etc...
Disadvantages and Advantages of Scruples
When one has the misfortune of allowing
oneself to be governed ^by scruples, baneful effects follow
for body and soul :
a) Scruples gradually induce a weakening and a certain
unbalancing of the nervous system. Fears and continual
anguish exercise a depressing action on bodily health; they
may even become a real obsession and bring about a species
of monomania, bordering on insanity.
b) Scruples becloud the mind and distor t the judgment :
little by little one loses the ability to discern between what
is sin and what is not sin, what is grievous and what slight ;
and the soul becomes much like a ship -without a rudder.
c) Loss of true devotion is often the sequel. The strain
of living in anxiety and vexation turns one into a terrible
egotist for whom everybody becomes an object of mistrust,
even God, Whom one deems too severe. Complaints arise
that He leaves one in that wretched state. Evidently, the
heart is incapable then of any genuine devotion.
d) Finally, come faults and even grave falls.
The scrupulous spend their strength in useless efforts over trifles,
and retain but little energy to meet important issues, for
the attention cannot be directed to bear with equal inten-
sity upon the entire line of battle. Hence, surprises, faults
and at times even grievous sins.
Besides, they instinctively seek relief for their sorrows ; but finding no solace in
piety, they seek it elsewhere, in reading and in associations
that are dangerous. This is sometimes the occasion of
lamentable falls which throw them into a deep state of
dejection.
On the other hand, if we know how to accent
scruples as a trial, and to correct them gradually with the
help of a wise spiritual director we derive from them price-
less advantages.
a) They serve to purify the soul. By being -intent on
avoiding the least sin and the least wilful imperfection, we
acquire a great purity of heart.
b) They lead us to the actual exercise of humility and
obedience by obliging us to refer our doubts in all simplicity
to our spiritual director, and to follow his counsel with
entire submission not only of will, but of judgment.
e) They contribute to increase the purity of our intentions
v by detaching us from spiritual comforts arid by having us
cling solely to God for Whom our love increases the 'more
He puts us to the test.
Scruples must be attacked before they take deep
root in the soul. Now the great remedy and indeed the
only remedy is obedience, full and absolute obedience to
an enlightened spiritual director. The light of conscience
has become dim and we must seek enlightenment elsewhere.
A scrupulous person is exactly- like a ship without rudder
or compass. The spiritual director, therefore, must win his
confidence and must know how to wield authority over him
if he is to effect a cure.
Before all else, it is necessary to gain his confid-
ence; for we do not easily obey those whom we do not
trust. This, however, is not always easily accomplished.
True, the scrupulous soul instinctively feels the need of
a guide, but some scrupulous persons do not dare abandon
themselves entirely to the said guide ; they want to consult,
indeed, but also to discuss the reasons. Now, one must not
enter into any discussion with the scrupulous, but speak to
them with authority, telling them categorically what they
must do.
To inspire this confidence the spiritual director must merit
it both by his competence and his devotedness.
a) He will allow the penitent to speak first, limiting
himself to a few. remarks here and there to show that he
has thoroughly understood. After that he will put a few
questions to the penitent, to which the latter will answer yes
or no, and thus the director will himself conduct the metho-
dical examination of the penitent's conscience. Then he
will add : I understand your case, you suffer in this or that
manner. To see that he has been well understood is
already a great comfort to the penitent, and at times-
suffices to win his confidence.
b) Devotedness must be joined to competence. The
spiritual director should therefore show himself patient,
listening quietly to the lengthy explanations of the peni-
tent, at least at the beginning. He must be kind, taking an
interest in that soul and expressing the desire and the hope
of curing it. He must be gentle, refraining: from taking
a tone of severity or harshness, even when he is obliged to
use the language of authority. Nothing wins confidence
better than this union of kindness and firmness.
Once the spiritual director has: gained the
confidence of his penitent, he must exercise his authority
and exact obedience, saying : If you want to be cured you
must obey blindly : in obeying you are always safe, even if
your spiritual director be mistaken, for God demands of
you only one thing just now, and that is obedience. . This
is so true that if you think that you cannot obey me, you
Taking into account his physiological state in consultation, perhaps,
with a doctor.
Must seek another spiritual director. Blind obedience alone
can cure you, and it will certainly do so.
a) In giving his orders the spiritual director must be
direct, clear and precise, avoiding any equivocation ; he must
be positive, speaking categorically, never conditionally ; for
instance, he will not say: If that disturbs your peace, do
not do it; rather he will say: Do this, avoid that, spurn
such temptation.
b) Generally no reasons must be given for the decisions,
especially at the beginning. Later on when the scrupulous
penitent is capable of understanding them, and of feeling
their weight, the director should briefly state these reasons
in order to form his conscience little by little. But there
must be no discussion of the decision itself. If there be any
obstacles to prevent its immediate execution, they are to be
taken into account, but the decision stands.
c) The spiritual director must not reverse his judgments.
Before giving a decision he considers it fully, and gives no
orders that he cannot insist upon; but once an order has
been given, it must not be revoked so long as there is no
new fact requiring a change.
d) To ascertain if the order has been clearly understood,
penitents should be asked to restate it, and then it but
remains to have them carry it .out. This is difficult; but
they must be plainly told that they must report on it,
and that if they have failed to- follow the advice given, they
will not be listened to until they have complied. There will
be ample opportunity, therefore, to repeat the same injunc-
tion many times. This is to be done without losing
patience, but with increasing firmness, and in the end the
scrupulous persons will yield obedience.
When the moment arrives, the spiritual director
must inculcate the general principle that will enable
scrupulous penitents to disregard, all doubts if need be,
he will have them put this principle in writing in this or a
similar form : in conscience, bound to take only evidence
into account, that is to say, a certitude that excludes
all doubt, a certitude as clear as the one" that tells me
that two and two make four. I cannot, therefore, commit
a sin either mortal or venial, unless I am absolutely certain
that the action I am to perform is forbidden under pain of
mortal or venial sin, and that .fully aware of this fact, I will
nevertheless to do it just the same. I will, therefore, pay
no attention whatsoever to probabilities, no matter how
strong they may be, I will hold myself bound solely by
clear-cut "and positive evidence. Barring such, there is no
sin. When the penitent proceeds to accuse himself of having
committed a venial or a mortal sin, the confessor must ask :
Can you affirm under oath that before acting you saw clearly -
that, this action was a sin and that seeing this you gave full
consent? Such a question will give precision to the general
principle laid down and will make it better understood.
Lastly, this general principle must be applied to the specific difficulties that arise.
a) With regard to a general confession after allowing it
once, the confessor should permit no repetition except when
there is certainty, on these two points : a mortal sin was
committed, and this sin has never been accuseds any valid
confession. As for the rest, after a certain lapse of time
the spiritual director should declare that the past must not
be touched upon under any circumstances and that, should
some sin have been omitted, it has been already pardoned
along with the others.
b) With regard to interior sins, thoughts and desires, the
following rule should be given during the crisis, divert your
attention by thinking of any other thing; after the crisis, do
not .examine yourself to see if you have sinned or not (this
would bring back the temptation), but pursue the even tenor
of your way by devoting yourself to your duties of state,
and receive Holy Communion as long as there is no evidence
that you have given full consent .
c) Communion is often a torture to the scrupulous.
They fear lest they be not in the state of grace or be not fast-
ing. Now, the fear lest they be not in the state of grace
proves that they are not certain of that fact ; hence, they
should after a sincere act of contrition approach the
Sacrament of the Altar; this contrition together with Holy
Communion will put them in the state of grace if they are
not in it. The Eucharistic fast must not prevent the
scrupulous from receiving Holy Communion unless they are
absolutely certain of having broken it.
d) Confession for the scrupulous is a still greater torture,
and therefore, it must be simplified for them. They should
be told: You are not bound to accuse any except mortal
sins. As to venial faults ,, make "mention only of those
that happen, to come to your mind during, your short exa-
mination of conscience, which should not exceed five
minutes. With regard to contrition, devote a little longer
time to ask it of God and to excite yourself to it, and then
you will have it. Should the penitent answer: " I don't
feel sorry", the confessor should reply that sorrow to be real
need not be felt, since it is an act of the will which has
nothing to do with feeling. In certain cases, when acruples
are very intense, one must go further and prescribe to the
penitent that he limit himself to this generic accusation:
"I accuse myself of all the sins committed since my last
confession and of all those of my past life, especially
against this or that virtue."
Replying to Difficulties.
Sometimes a penitent will say to his confessor : You take me for scrupulous,
whereas I am not. The confessor will answer: It is not for
you but for your confessor to decide that. Are you abso-
lutely sure that you'are not scrupulous? Are you calm and
at peace after making your confessions? Are you not
troubled with such doubts and worries as most persons
never experience? You are, therefore, not in a normal
state; you are affected with some physical and moral
disturbance, and therefore, need special treatment. Obey
without argument, and you will be cured ; otherwise your
trouble will only be aggravated.
By this and other like means one finally succeeds, with
God's grace, in curing this distressing malady of scruples.
- Pr. Adolphe Tanquerey (Tratat de ascetică şi mistică) -
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu